O_O :)

Nadiya Sytschak: Are you totally sure about the species?

WTF? Why it became _Spilosoma_ sannio? It's not even close (a different subtribe)... :/

Наразі вже досить багато знахідок в різних регіонах країни. Вид стає майже звичайним. :)

Heterolocha laminaria!!!

Дякую. Я просто хотів вдосконалитись: може, я чогось не розумію?

sergey_d: ???

Where?

Two different specimens: male & female. Please split.

Sorry, I have already forgot... :) Probably it was rather long time ago.

Since it was confirmed by Sami Karjalainen, I think there must be no doubts.

Could well be, but I am not totally sure.

Все не так просто. Загалом, їх не дуже коректно визначати за зовнішністю.

Cf. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/130670207

Probably a wrong photo.

Sorry, seemingly I was wrong.

What is the correct date: 27.05 or 02.06 (as in exif)?

duplicate of https://ukrbin.com/show_image.php?imageid=244222

"кравчик тягне листок у нірку" -- ???

Wow.

basileus: Будь ласка, дайте адресу.

Collecting date?

What was the date of _collecting_?

10.09.2020 is correct?

& Z. loti

linker: Two species are likely present. It is better to separate the photos (since they are showing different specimens).

Also one tandem of C. puella.

Polyommatus icarus and Plebejus sp.

Жалко. Возможно, Epitheca bimaculata; вид для Херсонской области не указывался. Другой вариант: Cordulia aenea.

Нет ли других снимков? Резче и/или с других ракурсов?

Координаты точны? По приведенным координатам, до Циркунов около 10 км...

canadensis from Colorado? :) No way...

Thanks. The problem is still partially present: all the photos that were erroneously associated with this one are now labeled as "Kharkiv Kharkiv", though they are mostly taken in various places, and the original coordinates are there. I do not know whether this already was before I have made a correction here. Quite possibly yes.

Some problems -- with the database or with me, I do not know... This photo was erroneously attributed as taken in Kharkiv. I was informed by the author and made a correction. The correction was made successfully, but _simultaneously_ most of observations of Sitochroa verticalis was distorted: they for some reason became associated with this photo (which I am almost sure I was not making). I do not know what to do now.

How to treat this type of records properly? Now the date "spoils" phenology of the species.

Date? "кінець серпня-початок вересня 2013" is NOT the same as 11.09.2013!

No reaction? :/

Zenovii Sych: Date? Cf. http://www.ukrbin.com/show_image.php?imageid=191320 -- same (but wrong) exif date, different "real" dates.

Admins: What is the protocol in such cases?

Zenovii Sych: Same date for this and http://www.ukrbin.com/show_image.php?imageid=191320 -- but different places. Also different dates in exif (both wrong, probably because of wrong setup, but _different_). Seems to be wrong. Please correct.

Так, "капустяна міль". Напевно, городи не тільки з часником, але й з капустою... ;)

Zenovii Sych, Nadiya Sytschak: Acrolepiopsis assectella (ZELLER, 1839) -- NOT Acrolepia. It is reasonable to double check taxonomy before adding a species. Acrolepiopsis assectella exists already.

In any case, this one is a different species.

OK, thanks. I just wanted to double check. Such a record is not impossible.

PS: Nekrutenko & Tchikolovets (2005) mention an old record from Chernivtsi region, but the source is not provided.

This could be a "new" (in fact, an old... :)) record for Chernivtsi region. Are you sure the label is correct?

The date seems to be incorrect: it must be spring.

Есть ли фото сбоку?

Aberration?

Этот снимок лучше отделить: здесь _действительно_ аргирогномон (вверху; внизу аргус).

A new record for Rivne region.

A new record for Lviv region.

Th. sylvestris could not be totally excluded.

Two different specimens: male & female.

This one http://www.ukrbin.com/edit_relimages.php?imageid=158016 should be also attached. On the other hand, this one http://www.ukrbin.com/show_image.php?imageid=158424 should be detached (this is a different specimen, a male!).

Дякую.

Эта фотография -- другой особи и другого вида! Как ее теперь отсоединить от двух остальных (которые, похоже одной особи и наверняка одного вида)? :/

pupation

20.06.2009 or 10.05.2020?

YuliaSpinova: По экзифу дата 17.06.2017 (что правдоподобно), а Вы поставили 22.04.2017 (что малоправдоподобно). Чему верить?

Да, верно. и даже "вернее" по современным представлениям. Надо бы и здесь таксономию заменить...

Глюк: два наблюдения "срослись"...

:)